Virginia Qui Tam Law.com
  • ABOUT VAQUITAMLAW.COM
Browsing: / Home / Attorney’s Fee Awards in Virginia State Courts 
Print Email Shortlink

Attorney’s Fee Awards in Virginia State Courts 

By Zachary Kitts on August 31, 2017 in Mandatory Fee Shifting Clauses in Litigation, Virginia Whistleblowers

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attorney’s Fee Awards in Virginia State Courts

As regular readers know, in addition to handling fee-shifting cases of my own, I am often asked to serve as an expert witness in litigation over reasonable attorney’s fees.  For years I have been mystified about the fact that Virginia state courts tend to award fees at lower rates than federal courts.  That could be because Circuit Courts are accustomed to more routine legal matters than federal courts.  It could also be that many Circuit Court judges are accustomed to “splitting the baby” so to speak.

Fortunately, several recent opinions from Virginia state courts give me some hope that this tide is turning and that Courts of the Commonwealth are beginning to take fee awards seriously.

A few months back I covered the SCOVA opinion in Lambert v. Sea Oats Condo Association.  There, the Supreme Court of Virginia overturned a Circuit Court that awarded a lawyer only $375 in attorney’s fees after hundreds of hours of work.  The Court based its reasoning on the idea that because the entire case was over a mere $500, it would be unreasonable and “unfair” (to use the term the Circuit Court used) to aware more than that amount in attorney’s fees.

Today, Virginia Lawyers Weekly covered a recent opinion from a Circuit Court for Hanover County in Winding Brook Owner’s Assoc. v. Thomlyn, LLC.  There, the total attorney’s fee award came to about ten times the amount of the judgment obtained.  The Circuit Court properly held that that should not matter, because the contract at issue contained a fee-shifting clause.

There is one aspect of the opinion that I predict will cause someone, somewhere, some heartache.  Judge Harros wrote: “Expert testimony is not required in all instances to prove the reasonableness of attorney’s fees, especially when the attorneys have submitted affidavits and detailed time records.”  This may be true in some instances.  For example, as part of a sanctions motion or a fee award for a discovery dispute, it might not be practical or warranted to require a lawyer to testify as an expert.

But when the amounts are large, or are likely to be larger than the total amount of damages awarded, I certainly agree with Virginia litigator Stephen Emmert who is quoted by Virginia Lawyers Weekly in the article.  Emmert — who has long been an iconic figure in Virginia legal circles — is quoted as saying: “If I were litigating something like this, I would always want to have an expert.”

To that I add my hearty “amen.”  And not just because I have served as a paid expert witness on this topic numerous times.  In fact, I would go one step further and add that a bifurcation motion — pursuant to Virginia Sup. Ct. Rule 3:25 should be litigated — preferably early on — in such cases.

Share this on: Mixx Delicious Digg Facebook Twitter
fee-shifting litigationreasonable fees and costsreasonable hourly rates for lawyers
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT PART II OF II: WHAT’S PAST IS PROLOGUE
  • PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT AND LEGAL ETHICS: WHAT’S PAST IS PROLOGUE
  • Justice Department Recovers over $3 Billion from False Claims Act Cases in Fiscal Year 2019
  • Federal False Claims Act Cases are not just about money
  • When is a claim submitted to the United States?
  • Updated two-volume set on Employment Law in Virginia is on its way
  • The National Conference of State Legislatures Identifies the Top Ten Issues Facing State Governments in 2013…
  • AND THE WINNER IS … MARK OBENSHAIN EMERGES AS THE REPUBLICAN NOMINEE FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL
  • Interesting Developments from the Virginia State Bar…a/k/a The Curious Case of Glenn Lewis
  • Strange developments from the HHS-OIG…and a few basic truths about government
  • BREAKING NEWS IN THE 2013 RACE FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL: Virginia Democrats Nominate state Senator Mark Herring for Attorney General
  • Two Virginia executives go to prison for small-business set-aside fraud
← Previous Next →

Search

Monthly Archives

  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019

Authors

  • Zachary Kitts

Copyright © 2021 Virginia Qui Tam Law.com.

Virginia Qui Tam Law.com is the first blog dedicated to the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act and to false claims act litigation in Virginia.