Virginia Qui Tam Law.com
  • ABOUT VAQUITAMLAW.COM
Browsing: / Home / Trade Secrets and Qui Tam — Part Two
Print Email Shortlink

Trade Secrets and Qui Tam — Part Two

By Zachary Kitts on May 19, 2016 in False Claims Act Litigation Strategies, How to be a successful qui tam whistleblower, Legal Ethics, qui tam whistleblowers

Virginia Qui Tam Law.com -- The first blog dedicated to the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act and to Qui Tam Litigation in Virginia

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade Secrets and Qui Tam — Part Two

This is part two of a two part post on the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016, which was signed into law last week. Part one of this post introduced the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 and, most relevant to regular readers of this blog, the whistleblower protection provisions of the Defendant Trade Secrets Act.

Today we will look at the reasons why it was necessary to include whistleblower protections in the law in the first place.  It was necessary because defendants will sometimes — not often, but sometimes — bring counterclaims against qui tam relators for making copies of documents (or copying information in electronic form) to support their qui tam action.

Counterclaims of this nature are never successful if the relator copied documents and/or other information solely for purposes of bringing a qui tam action and has conducted his or herself like an adult person with a brain.

There have been a few interesting examples of how this type of counterclaim usually ends up.  One recent opinion came out of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois a few weeks ago.  In that case qui tam relator Matthew Cieszynski had a defendant’s counterclaim dismissed against him.  That case is captioned United States ex rel. Matthew Cieszynski, et al. v. LifeWatch Services Inc., No. 13 C 4052 and you can read the Magistrate Judge’s opinion here.

Mind you, courts have more or less universally sided with qui tam relators in these types of counterclaims.  The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has several opinions on this point.  For example, in X Corp. v. John Doe,805 F.Supp. 1298 (1992)  Judge Ellis authored a well-reasoning and thorough opinion.

At the end of the day, there are important public policy interests underlying the FCA, and those interest support fully relators’ potential need to collect evidence in a manner that might otherwise violate the person’s employment contract, etc.

Next time around, we will look at how a relator should not conduct his or herself when collecting evidence for a qui tam action — and that opinion too is from the Eastern District.

K&G Law Group PLLC

 

 

 

Share this on: Mixx Delicious Digg Facebook Twitter
Unique elements of practice under the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT PART II OF II: WHAT’S PAST IS PROLOGUE
  • PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT AND LEGAL ETHICS: WHAT’S PAST IS PROLOGUE
  • Justice Department Recovers over $3 Billion from False Claims Act Cases in Fiscal Year 2019
  • Federal False Claims Act Cases are not just about money
  • When is a claim submitted to the United States?
  • Updated two-volume set on Employment Law in Virginia is on its way
  • The National Conference of State Legislatures Identifies the Top Ten Issues Facing State Governments in 2013…
  • AND THE WINNER IS … MARK OBENSHAIN EMERGES AS THE REPUBLICAN NOMINEE FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL
  • Interesting Developments from the Virginia State Bar…a/k/a The Curious Case of Glenn Lewis
  • Strange developments from the HHS-OIG…and a few basic truths about government
  • BREAKING NEWS IN THE 2013 RACE FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL: Virginia Democrats Nominate state Senator Mark Herring for Attorney General
  • Two Virginia executives go to prison for small-business set-aside fraud
← Previous Next →

Search

Monthly Archives

  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019

Authors

  • Zachary Kitts

Copyright © 2021 Virginia Qui Tam Law.com.

Virginia Qui Tam Law.com is the first blog dedicated to the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act and to false claims act litigation in Virginia.