Virginia Qui Tam Law.com
  • ABOUT VAQUITAMLAW.COM
Browsing: / Home / The new and improved Anti-Kickback Act and fraud in government procurement
Print Email Shortlink

The new and improved Anti-Kickback Act and fraud in government procurement

By Zachary Kitts on October 11, 2013 in False Claims Act Practice in Virginia, Potential Uses of the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act, Qui Tam practice in Virginia, Uncategorized

Virginia Qui Tam Law.com -- The first blog dedicated to the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act and to Qui Tam Litigation in Virginia

 

 

 

 

 

 

The new and improved Anti-Kickback Act and fraud in government procurement.

Today we will take a look at the new and improved Anti-Kickback Act, found at 41 U.S.C. § 8701, and how the improved AKA factors into litigation under the federal False Claims Act.  More specifically, we will look at how a violation of the Anti-Kickback Act would render any subsequent claim to the government “false” within the meaning of the FCA.

Please note that we are referring to the Anti-kickback Act and not to the AKS, or the Anti-kickback Statute that applies to health care providers.  That statute was originally passed in 1972 and has been amended numerous times also.  Among other things the AKS (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b)) prohibits submission of claims for any health care services provided or procured through the payment of a kickback.  The AKA that is the topic of this post is directed at federal procurement generally and not at health care fraud.

The original Anti-Kickback Act (“AKA”) was passed in 1946 as a result of contracting abuses during the Second World War; the statute’s original goal was somewhat limited.  Initially the AKA was designed to deter subcontractors from making — and to deter prime contractors from accepting — payments for the reward of work.  However, the limited goal of the statute led to a number of unintended results.  For example, the original statute was interpreted by the courts as applying only to cost plus contracts, creating an open-season on firm fixed price contracts.

Congress made slight tweaks and revisions to the AKA from time to time for the next 40 years or so, but the statute was totally overhauled in 1986.  The legislative history contains strong language from Congress about the problem of kickbacks in federal procurement.

Whatever form they take, all kickbacks serve to undermine Federal procurement …. Furthermore, inflated contract pricing is not their only effect. Kickback activity corrupts the Federal procurement system. It drives out honest competitors and destroys the markets in which the government must bargain.  See,  H.R. Rep. NO. 99–964, at 5 (1986), reprinted in 1986 U.S.C.C.A.N. at 5962.

The 1986 amendments to the statute did make it marginally better.  For example, the 1986 amendments expanded the reach of the statute to include, for the first time, kickbacks paid in connection with any “negotiated” contract.

A handful of important cases interpreting the AKA followed the 1986 amendment.  One 1994 case — important for our purposes in this blog post — held that the AKA did not preempt the government’s claims for damages from government contractor under the federal False Claims Act and federal common law.  See, United States v. General Dynamics, 19 F3d 770 (2nd Cir. 1994).

In 2011 the statute underwent its most recent revisions.  To date there is no case law interpreting the latest version of the AKA, but as with past amendments, the law has been strengthened considerably.  I think it is clear that Congress intended any claim tainted by a kickback be rendered “false” such that it would be ineligible for payment.  Consider the stark language of § 8707: “A person that knowingly and willfully engages in conduct prohibited by section 8702 of this title shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both.”  See, 41 U.S.C § 8707

That should leave no question in anyone’s mind how Congress feels about kickbacks in federal procurement.  Add to this the — already ample — common law authority that government contracts tainted by fraud or wrong-doing are void ab initio (see, United States v. Miss. Valley Generating Co., 364 U.S. 520, 81 S.Ct. 294, 317 (1961)) and I think we have on our hands a great new area for FCA expansion.

 

K&G Law Group is a boutique-style law firm based in Nothern Virginia and practicing nationwide

 

 

Share this on: Mixx Delicious Digg Facebook Twitter
anti-kickback actclaims tainted by kickbacksfalse claims act litigationfraud on government programsVirginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • The federal False Claims Act is Important because it reduces corruption in American Society
  • Blog Author Zachary Kitts Announces Second-Largest Settlement in Virginia for 2021
  • K&G Law Group Announces Partial Settlement of Qui Tam Action for $12.7 million (Part I)
  • PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT PART II OF II: WHAT’S PAST IS PROLOGUE
  • PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT AND LEGAL ETHICS: WHAT’S PAST IS PROLOGUE
  • Justice Department Recovers over $3 Billion from False Claims Act Cases in Fiscal Year 2019
  • The Blog of Legal Times on argument in Allison Engine Company v. United States ex rel Thacker
  • Practice Examples: Fairfax County Budget Woes and the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act
  • Qui Tam Resource Tip: the Project on Government Oversight
  • Virginia Achieves A-minus Rating for Good Government
  • Qui Tam Practice Example: Documentation of a Qui Tam Claim is not to be taken lightly by potential relators
  • LexisNexis and the National Institute for Trial Advocacy (NITA) to publish new practice commentaries on the Federal False Claims Act
← Previous Next →

Search

Monthly Archives

  • October 2022
  • April 2022
  • June 2021
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019

Authors

  • Zachary Kitts

Copyright © 2023 Virginia Qui Tam Law.com.

Virginia Qui Tam Law.com is the first blog dedicated to the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act and to false claims act litigation in Virginia.