Virginia Qui Tam Law.com
  • ABOUT VAQUITAMLAW.COM
Browsing: / Home / Fredericksburg Hospitalist Group Pays $4.2 Million to Settle False Claims Act Case
Print Email Shortlink

Fredericksburg Hospitalist Group Pays $4.2 Million to Settle False Claims Act Case

By Zachary Kitts on June 30, 2017 in False Claims Act Practice in Virginia, How to be a successful qui tam whistleblower, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act

 

Fredericksburg Hospitalist Group Pays $4.2 Million to Settle False Claims Act Case

The United States Department of Justice and the Virginia Office of the Attorney General announced a $4.2 million settlement in a qui tam case of mine earlier this month.  My firm (K&G Law Group) was one of three firms involved and so I would be remiss not to mention my esteemed co-counsel, Steve Baril and Mike Lesser.

We jointly represented Rick Morrow, a former executive of Fredericksburg Hospitalist Group, P.C.  Mr. Morrow will receive 17% of the total settlement.  Mr. Morrow, who has spent his entire career in health care, was pleased with the outcome:  “Overbilling for health care services saps our federal and state tax dollars, and I am glad we have laws like the federal False Claims Act and the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act that level the playing field and allowed me to address these wrongs.”

The Complaint was filed on Mr. Morrow’s behalf in 2014 and his allegations — that defendants upcoded hospitalist services from 2010 to 2015 — were investigated by Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert McIntosh, and Assistant Attorney Generals Vincent J. Vaccarella and Adele M. Neiburg.

In a statement U.S. Attorney Dana J. Boente said “Rooting out fraudulent billing by healthcare providers is a priority; this office will continue to pursue such matters vigorously.

Hospitalists — defined as physicians who focus only on treating patients within a hospital — typically bill using CPT codes for patient evaluation and management services.   These include codes 99221-99223 (initial hospital care services) and  99231‑99233 (subsequent hospital care). Each of these groups of codes has three levels, for low, moderate, and high complexity. Thus, CPT 99221 is a low complexity initial encounter; CPT 99222 is one of moderate complexity, and CPT 99223 is an initial encounter of high complexity.

These codes also have an option to bill based on face-to-face time spent with the patient.  For example, codes 99221 covers up to 30 minutes, 99222 covers up to 50 minutes and 99223 covers up to 70 minutes.  If billing based on time, the physician is required to properly document the patient encounter to justify the billing amount and CPT code.  As regular readers know, in the world of FCA qui tam litigation, cases like this are commonly called “upcoding cases,” but the truth is that upcoding just means billing for services not provided.

For my part, I would like to thank all of the aforementioned government lawyers, Mr. Morrow (for being such a great client) and Mike and Steve for being some of the best lawyers I have ever worked with.

 

 

 

Share this on: Mixx Delicious Digg Facebook Twitter
CPT codes 99221-99223overbilling hospitalist servicesupcoding qui tam
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • The federal False Claims Act is Important because it reduces corruption in American Society
  • Blog Author Zachary Kitts Announces Second-Largest Settlement in Virginia for 2021
  • K&G Law Group Announces Partial Settlement of Qui Tam Action for $12.7 million (Part I)
  • PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT PART II OF II: WHAT’S PAST IS PROLOGUE
  • PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT AND LEGAL ETHICS: WHAT’S PAST IS PROLOGUE
  • Justice Department Recovers over $3 Billion from False Claims Act Cases in Fiscal Year 2019
  • The Blog of Legal Times on argument in Allison Engine Company v. United States ex rel Thacker
  • Practice Examples: Fairfax County Budget Woes and the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act
  • Qui Tam Resource Tip: the Project on Government Oversight
  • Virginia Achieves A-minus Rating for Good Government
  • Qui Tam Practice Example: Documentation of a Qui Tam Claim is not to be taken lightly by potential relators
  • LexisNexis and the National Institute for Trial Advocacy (NITA) to publish new practice commentaries on the Federal False Claims Act
← Previous Next →

Search

Monthly Archives

  • October 2022
  • April 2022
  • June 2021
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019

Authors

  • Zachary Kitts

Copyright © 2023 Virginia Qui Tam Law.com.

Virginia Qui Tam Law.com is the first blog dedicated to the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act and to false claims act litigation in Virginia.