Virginia Qui Tam Law.com
  • ABOUT VAQUITAMLAW.COM
Browsing: / Home / Virginia’s Next Attorney General Should Focus on the War on Fraud
Print Email Shortlink

Virginia’s Next Attorney General Should Focus on the War on Fraud

By Zachary Kitts on December 14, 2013 in False Claims Act Practice in Virginia, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Potential Uses of the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act, Qui Tam practice in Virginia

Virginia Qui Tam Law.com -- The first blog dedicated to the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act and to Qui Tam Litigation in Virginia

 

 

 

 

 

 

With a recount pending in Virginia’s Attorney General race, Virginians will not know for several more weeks whether Democrat Mark Herring or Republican Mark Obenshain will be Virginia’s next Attorney General.  This much, however, we know:  regardless of which candidate ultimately fills the position, continuing the fight against fraud on Virginia’s public fisc using the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act will be among his chief tasks, and he would do well to make it a priority of his administration.

In that regard, the next Attorney General is fortunate in that he will inherit one of the nation’s elite Medicaid Fraud Control Units.  This prominence is the result of many factors, including the MFCU’s leadership and the fact that Virginia was one of the first states in the country to adopt a statute based on the federal False Claims Act.  Since the General Assembly passed the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act in 2002, the “MFCU” as the unit is known has, on average, returned more than $228 million per year to the public fisc by vigorously prosecuting health care fraud, which comes to more than $3.1 million per MFCU employee.

Without question, the next Attorney General will do well to encourage the unit to continue its winning ways.  Health care programs are only one part of Virginia’s budget, however, and the next Attorney General should use the example set by the MFCU and create a special unit to vigorously investigate and prosecute non-health care fraud on the Commonwealth.  There is absolutely no reason why a non-healthcare civil fraud unit could not obtain similar results, with the right leadership.

By definition, controversial topics are more interesting than uncontroversial topics, and it is unfortunate that when people think of “Ken Cuccinelli” and “Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act” they are most likely to think of Mr. Cuccinelli’s controversial investigation of climate scientist Michael Mann, and not of his uncontroversial use of the same statute to recover non-health care funds stolen from the Commonwealth.  While Mr. Cuccinelli did not take the step of creating a special unit to investigate and prosecute non-health care cases, he did focus on such cases to a greater degree than any of predecessors, and the Commonwealth is without question better off for it.  A partial listing of those victories would include the 2012 settlement with Bank of New York Mellon for transactions it handled on behalf of Virginia Retirement Services, a recent jury verdict in California against manufacturer JM Eagle for selling defective plastic pipes to the Commonwealth, and a settlement with CA Technologies for false charges to Virginia government agencies for software updates.

Virginia’s state government is known nationally for its careful use of money, and the manner in which the monies recovered from civil fraud cases are used is no exception.  In the past year alone, Mr. Cuccinelli was able to use $30 million recovered by his office in VFATA cases to cover gaps in state pension funds and $4.2 million to train sheriff’s deputies and police departments across the Commonwealth to better handle crises involving mentally ill individuals; and these are just two examples.  In total, tens of millions more was distributed to local government officials to use for appropriate purposes, and that does not – repeat, does not – include the tens of millions of dollars the Office of the Attorney General was able to return to the Commonwealth’s General Fund.

Governments of every stripe – federal, state and local – are quick to point to a lack of resources to justify inactivity, and when governments refer to “resources” what they mean is money.  To be sure, monetary resources are important.  History demonstrates, however, that leadership is by far the most important resource if government is to be effective; history further demonstrates that a just a little bit of leadership goes a long way when applied in the right places.  By demonstrating the leadership needed to create a top-notch affirmative civil enforcement unit for non-health care claims, the next Attorney General will no doubt be able to claim a string of accomplishments that far exceeds any of his predecessors, to the benefit of all Virginia taxpayers.    

 

K&G Law Group is a boutique-style law firm based in Nothern Virginia and practicing nationwide

Share this on: Mixx Delicious Digg Facebook Twitter
2013 race for Virginia attorney general2013 Virginia electionsfraud on the governmenthealth care fraudVirginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • The federal False Claims Act is Important because it reduces corruption in American Society
  • Blog Author Zachary Kitts Announces Second-Largest Settlement in Virginia for 2021
  • K&G Law Group Announces Partial Settlement of Qui Tam Action for $12.7 million (Part I)
  • PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT PART II OF II: WHAT’S PAST IS PROLOGUE
  • PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT AND LEGAL ETHICS: WHAT’S PAST IS PROLOGUE
  • Justice Department Recovers over $3 Billion from False Claims Act Cases in Fiscal Year 2019
  • The Blog of Legal Times on argument in Allison Engine Company v. United States ex rel Thacker
  • Practice Examples: Fairfax County Budget Woes and the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act
  • Qui Tam Resource Tip: the Project on Government Oversight
  • Virginia Achieves A-minus Rating for Good Government
  • Qui Tam Practice Example: Documentation of a Qui Tam Claim is not to be taken lightly by potential relators
  • LexisNexis and the National Institute for Trial Advocacy (NITA) to publish new practice commentaries on the Federal False Claims Act
← Previous Next →

Search

Monthly Archives

  • October 2022
  • April 2022
  • June 2021
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019

Authors

  • Zachary Kitts

Copyright © 2023 Virginia Qui Tam Law.com.

Virginia Qui Tam Law.com is the first blog dedicated to the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act and to false claims act litigation in Virginia.