Virginia Qui Tam Law.com
  • ABOUT VAQUITAMLAW.COM
Browsing: / Home / Davita Dialysis Centers settle non-intervened qui tam lawsuit for $495 million
Print Email Shortlink

Davita Dialysis Centers settle non-intervened qui tam lawsuit for $495 million

By Zachary Kitts on June 26, 2015 in False Claims Act Litigation Strategies, federal False Claims Act, U.S. Department of Justice

Virginia Qui Tam Law.com -- The first blog dedicated to the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act and to Qui Tam Litigation in Virginia

 

 

 

 

 

 

Davita Dialysis Centers settle non-intervened qui tam lawsuit for $495 million

Regular readers might recall my post on an epic discovery battle fought in the Northern District of Georgia.  Today, I am happy to announce that a very abnormal discovery battle has ended and Davita Dialysis Centers will settle a non-intervened qui tam lawsuit for $495 million.  The entire case has settled as a result of the aforementioned discovery battle, after it became clear that a federal judge was not going to allow certain very bizarre discovery shenanigans by DaVita to continue.

And when I say that the discovery shenanigans were bizarre, I mean they were bizarre.  In a nutshell, during fact discovery numerous witnesses changed their testimony in the exact same way either during their depositions or after the fact via an errata sheet.  How exactly DaVita and their lawyers thought this ruse would work is beyond comprehension, but in my opinion it worked out exactly like it should have.

That is to say, with U.S. District Judge Charles A. Pannell interviewing the witnesses himself in chambers, DaVita’s lawyers hiring their own lawyers, and with the Judge ultimately declaring the attorney-client privilege between DaVita and its lawyers null and void and ordering discovery re-opened so that relator’s counsel could probe into the exact communications that caused each and every witness to change their testimony on the exact same topic.

And when that happened, the case settled to the tune of $495 million dollars, making it one of the larges non-intervened settlements of all time.  (As regular readers know, when a case is non-intervened it means the relator and his lawyers — in this case, Marlan Wilbanks and L. Lin Wood — prosecute the case themselves, without assistance from the Government.)

That, in and of itself, would be interesting enough to warrant a blog post, but there was one final interesting twist this week with the press releases issued by the United States Department of Justice and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Georgia.  The use of press releases by DoJ is of course one way the Government wields its power, and it is also one of the ways DoJ and the United States spread the word about the power of the federal False Claims Act; as a result, DoJ always does a press release when it settles a case, or when a criminal indictment is handed down, or when other breaking news takes place.  When a non-intervened case settles, however, the United States does not normally issue a press release.

Moreover, even when Justice does a press release for an intervened qui tam case, they do not include the name of the relator’s private counsel or even disclose the fact that the relator had private counsel.  But yesterday, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of George broke both taboos, at least for a short period.  First, it issued this press release which names Marlan Wilbanks and Lin Wood by name as the relators’ lawyers and gives credit where credit is due for their extraordinary efforts.  The original press release includes the following on page three:

The United States did not intervene in the whistleblowers’ action; counsel for the whistleblowers, L. Lin Wood and Marlan B. Wilbanks, litigated this action, which was monitored by the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Georgia and the Civil Division of the United States Department of Justice. To bring this case to its successful resolution, whistleblowers Dr. Vanier and Mr. Barbir, along with their attorneys, Lin Wood and Marlan Wilbanks, engaged in extensive and exceptional litigation efforts.

Later that same day, the press release was modified to read as such on the webpage for the Northern District of Georgia USAO.

Oh well — but congrats to Mr. Wilbanks and to Mr. Wood are in order for their historic and hard-fought victory!

 

K&G Law Group is a boutique-style law firm based in Nothern Virginia and practicing nationwide

 

 

 

Share this on: Mixx Delicious Digg Facebook Twitter
discovery battles in False Claims Act casesfalse claims act litigationfalse claims act settlements
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • The federal False Claims Act is Important because it reduces corruption in American Society
  • Blog Author Zachary Kitts Announces Second-Largest Settlement in Virginia for 2021
  • K&G Law Group Announces Partial Settlement of Qui Tam Action for $12.7 million (Part I)
  • PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT PART II OF II: WHAT’S PAST IS PROLOGUE
  • PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT AND LEGAL ETHICS: WHAT’S PAST IS PROLOGUE
  • Justice Department Recovers over $3 Billion from False Claims Act Cases in Fiscal Year 2019
  • The Blog of Legal Times on argument in Allison Engine Company v. United States ex rel Thacker
  • Practice Examples: Fairfax County Budget Woes and the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act
  • Qui Tam Resource Tip: the Project on Government Oversight
  • Virginia Achieves A-minus Rating for Good Government
  • Qui Tam Practice Example: Documentation of a Qui Tam Claim is not to be taken lightly by potential relators
  • LexisNexis and the National Institute for Trial Advocacy (NITA) to publish new practice commentaries on the Federal False Claims Act
← Previous Next →

Search

Monthly Archives

  • October 2022
  • April 2022
  • June 2021
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019

Authors

  • Zachary Kitts

Copyright © 2023 Virginia Qui Tam Law.com.

Virginia Qui Tam Law.com is the first blog dedicated to the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act and to false claims act litigation in Virginia.