Zachary Kitts

Zachary Kitts

Zachary Kitts is a founding partner at K&G Law Group, PLLC, where he concentrates his practice in the areas of qui tam litigation under the False Claims Act, employment law, business torts, and other complex civil litigation matters. In total, Zach's false claims act cases have returned more than $118 million to federal, state, and local governments. Zach has been involved in a number of precedent-setting false claims act cases against banks and financial services companies, healthcare providers, defense contractors, and others.

Announcing upcoming CLE Seminar on Statutory Attorney’s Fees in Virginia Courts

I will be speaking at an upcoming seminar through Virginia CLE which may be of interest to some readers.  The seminar concerns court-awarded attorney’s fees in Virginia’s state and federal courts, with a focus on the mechanics of fee petitions, and fee-shifting litigation.  […]

Why do you think all the most business-friendly states have state False Claims Acts?

Over the past few years I have noticed that certain questions and objections sometimes arise when a state considers a state False Claims Act.  Today’s post deals with the single most common objection and/or question. As an aside, I have also […]

The Washington State False Claims Act Legislative Battle Continues…

              Washington State False Claims Act legislative battle continues… I wanted to update readers on another legislative battle, this time in Washington state. The Washington False Claims Act, has been introduced by state Sen. Adam Kline as […]

Important Considerations for Settlement in a Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act case

As I have said many times, there is no practice area quite as complicated as false claims act litigation under either the federal False Claims Act or the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act (or for that matter under any of […]

The Ohio False Claims Act is Introduced…

Other than the changes to the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act and the Illinois False Claims Act, the 2011 legislative session has been rather uneventful in terms of state false claims act legislation.  However, in some late-breaking news from Ohio, Senate […]

Two Major–and Historic–Events in the Past Seven Days…

In the last seven days, two major historic events occurred.  Although very few Virginians paid attention or cared, we will all notice the benefit bestowed on our Commonwealth by these two events…On Saturday, March 26th, Governor Bob McDonnell signed groundbreaking amendments to […]

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Issues Opinion in ACLU et al. v. Eric H. Holder, et al.

After several months of waiting, today the Fourth Circuit issued its 

The Washington Post misses the mark on doctor self-referrals, but they should still get points for trying…

Recently, the Washington Post featured an editorial applauding Maryland’s 18
year old statute banning physician self-referrals and encouraging other states to follow Maryland’s example. Sadly, the WaPo editorial misses the mark, although they do get points
for trying.

WaPo misses the mark because if they were going to take up an esoteric–but important–subject, physician self-referrals should not have been the number one thing on the list. It would have
been far more helpful if they had directed their efforts towards the passage of a Maryland False Claims Act …

Still the “Rocket Docket” after all these years…

It seems the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia is still far and away the speediest venue available among the 94 U.S. District Court in the country according to
report issued by the United States Courts. 

The report covers the 12 calendar months ending Sept. 30, 2010. During that time frame 2,067 cases were filed in the Eastern District of Virginia, which by my rough estimate puts the court in the
top 10 nationwide in terms of volume. …

The Supreme Court of Virginia Grants Appeal in Cuccinelli v. UVa

Yesterday, SCOVA announced that it had granted the Attorney General’s appeal  from a ruling quashing
the AG”s civil investigative demand to the University of Virginia. As readers are aware, the Order was entered by Judge Peatross in the Circuit Court of Albemarle County.

The following are the assignments of error:

  1. The circuit court erred in setting aside the CIDs based on the ground that the Attorney General lacked a “reason to believe” that UVa. may be in possession, custody, or control …