Virginia Qui Tam Law.com
ABOUT VAQUITAMLAW.COM
Browsing:
/
Home
/
New Opinion from the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia interprets the public disclosure bar and release agreements
Print
Email
Shortlink
New Opinion from the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia interprets the public disclosure bar and release agreements
By
Zachary Kitts
on
October 14, 2008
in
False Claims Act Practice in Virginia
,
Virginia Whistleblowers
In the ongoing saga of Purdue Pharma, an
Cook & Kitts, PLLC
Share this on:
Mixx
Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Twitter
Related Stories
Most Popular
The federal False Claims Act is Important because it reduces corruption in American Society
Blog Author Zachary Kitts Announces Second-Largest Settlement in Virginia for 2021
K&G Law Group Announces Partial Settlement of Qui Tam Action for $12.7 million (Part I)
PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT PART II OF II: WHAT’S PAST IS PROLOGUE
PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT AND LEGAL ETHICS: WHAT’S PAST IS PROLOGUE
Justice Department Recovers over $3 Billion from False Claims Act Cases in Fiscal Year 2019
The Blog of Legal Times on argument in Allison Engine Company v. United States ex rel Thacker
Practice Examples: Fairfax County Budget Woes and the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act
Qui Tam Resource Tip: the Project on Government Oversight
Virginia Achieves A-minus Rating for Good Government
Qui Tam Practice Example: Documentation of a Qui Tam Claim is not to be taken lightly by potential relators
LexisNexis and the National Institute for Trial Advocacy (NITA) to publish new practice commentaries on the Federal False Claims Act
Leave a Reply
Click here to cancel reply.
Comment
Name
*
Email
*
Website
Δ
← Previous
Next →
Search
Monthly Archives
October 2022
April 2022
June 2021
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
Authors
Zachary Kitts
