An important new opinion issued today by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Alexandria Division) discusses the mandatory disclosure and seal requirements of the Federal False Claims Act. The opinion can be found on Westlaw as United States ex rel. Ubl v. IIF Data Solutions, et al., 2009 WL 1254704 (E.D.Va.) or by clicking I posted on the topic of whether the provisions of Va. Code 8.01-216.5 apply to the Virginia Attorney General’s Office. In other words, would the OAG need to file a self-initiated VFATA complaint under seal. Judge O’Grady’s opinion provides further support for my position.
The specific issue in the May 5 opinion is an amended complaint filed by the relator, and defendants’ motion to dismiss on the grounds that relator did not comply with the seal requirements of the statute.
Important New Opinion from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Addresses the Seal Requirements of the Federal False Claims Act
By Zachary Kitts on May 5, 2009 in False Claims Act Practice in Virginia, Qui Tam practice in Virginia, Virginia Whistleblowers
- Upcoming VaCLE Seminars on Hanging a Shingle and Reasonable Attorney Fees in Virginia
- Healthcare Records, Qui Tam Whistleblowers and HIPAA
- Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act Amendments for 2018
- California Governor Jerry Brown signs the new California False Claims Act into law…but the law still lacks an alternate remedies clause to protect relators
- The National Conference of State Legislatures Identifies the Top Ten Issues Facing State Governments in 2013…
- Updates from Annapolis — House of Delegates Committee Hears Testimony on the Maryland False Claims Act of 2013
- A Happy Belated Birthday for the federal False Claims Act!
- All Federal Court Practitioners Should be Aware of Proposed Changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
- Building a Precedent — First Recovery for a Local Government Employee under the Anti-Retaliation Provisions of the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act