An important new opinion issued today by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Alexandria Division) discusses the mandatory disclosure and seal requirements of the Federal False Claims Act. The opinion can be found on Westlaw as United States ex rel. Ubl v. IIF Data Solutions, et al., 2009 WL 1254704 (E.D.Va.) or by clicking I posted on the topic of whether the provisions of Va. Code 8.01-216.5 apply to the Virginia Attorney General’s Office. In other words, would the OAG need to file a self-initiated VFATA complaint under seal. Judge O’Grady’s opinion provides further support for my position.
The specific issue in the May 5 opinion is an amended complaint filed by the relator, and defendants’ motion to dismiss on the grounds that relator did not comply with the seal requirements of the statute.
Important New Opinion from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Addresses the Seal Requirements of the Federal False Claims Act
By Zachary Kitts on May 5, 2009 in False Claims Act Practice in Virginia, Qui Tam practice in Virginia, Virginia Whistleblowers
- Professionalism in Client Relations
- It’s Official — K&G Law Group has the largest settlement in Virginia for 2018
- Federal False Claims Act case against Virginia Birth Injury Fund settles for $20.7M
- Small is the New Big in Law Firms — but some folks still don’t get it
- My two-cents on law as a career — for what it’s worth
- One way to handle the other side’s resistance to paying attorney’s fees – “We’re made from rubber, and you’re made from glue….”
- West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey reviews his first 100 days in office…and puts a West Virginia False Claims Act at the top of his wish list
- Interesting Opinion on Lawyer Contingency Fees … And Proof that no good deed goes unpunished.
- Truly There Is Nothing New Under the Sun — And Even Lance Armstrong’s Highly Paid Lawyers Can’t Come Up with Something New….