An important new opinion issued today by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Alexandria Division) discusses the mandatory disclosure and seal requirements of the Federal False Claims Act. The opinion can be found on Westlaw as United States ex rel. Ubl v. IIF Data Solutions, et al., 2009 WL 1254704 (E.D.Va.) or by clicking I posted on the topic of whether the provisions of Va. Code 8.01-216.5 apply to the Virginia Attorney General’s Office. In other words, would the OAG need to file a self-initiated VFATA complaint under seal. Judge O’Grady’s opinion provides further support for my position.
The specific issue in the May 5 opinion is an amended complaint filed by the relator, and defendants’ motion to dismiss on the grounds that relator did not comply with the seal requirements of the statute.
Important New Opinion from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Addresses the Seal Requirements of the Federal False Claims Act
By Zachary Kitts on May 5, 2009 in False Claims Act Practice in Virginia, Qui Tam practice in Virginia, Virginia Whistleblowers
- Commentary on the Top Virginia Verdicts for 2017 (as published by Virginia Lawyers Weekly)
- How to Be a Successful Qui Tam Whistleblower
- Lawyers and Client Confidentiality
- It must be getting too dangerous to traffick drugs…
- Update on the State Legislative Front — Maryland Delegate Sam Arora Introduces the Maryland False Claims Act of 2013
- Overview of state methods for using the money recovered from state false claims act prosecutions
- K&G Law Group takes Second Place in the Annual Virginia Lawyers Weekly feature “Top Settlements for 2012”
- The National Conference of State Legislatures Identifies the Top Ten Issues Facing State Governments in 2013…
- Updates from Annapolis — House of Delegates Committee Hears Testimony on the Maryland False Claims Act of 2013