Virginia Qui Tam Law.com
  • ABOUT VAQUITAMLAW.COM
Browsing: / Home / False Claims Act Filings Under Seal — a Closer Look
Print Email Shortlink

False Claims Act Filings Under Seal — a Closer Look

By Zachary Kitts on August 29, 2015 in federal False Claims Act litigation, qui tam seal period, Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act

shutterstock_74629765

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

False Claims Act Filings Under Seal — a Closer Look

To many lawyers — even experienced federal court litigators — qui tam litigation under the federal False Claims Act is something mysterious and exotic.  This is the result of several factors, but most of those factors relate in some way to the seal.

Federal False Claims Act cases must be filed under seal

Federal false claims act cases must be initially filed under seal with the Court, and the same thing is true for all state false claims actions.

In addition to the hurdles of filing a complaint under seal (as required by the FCA) there is also the fact that many cases stay under seal for quite a long time.  Many lawyers dislike this, for understandable reasons.  Many Judges also dislike this, because Judges are evaluated and scored based on how fast they move their cases.  But, when the rubber meets the road — that is, when lawyers and Judges are shown clear-cut ways that they can move dockets along, including qui tam cases under seal — many members of the legal community balk at taking simple steps that can really move cases along.

So I read with interest Judge Anderson’s standing order on false claims act cases in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina.  Judge Anderson very reasonably entered this standing order to make it known that from that point forward — the order was entered in 2013 — extensions of the seal period would be given only for “good cause shown” as required by the FCA itself.

Judge Anderson does not define what will, in the future, constitute “good cause” for a seal extension.  Indeed, it would be impossible to do that.  Instead, he provides two examples of things that will not suffice to get an extension – settlement discussions and waiting for documents from a defendant.

I happen to agree with him on both points.  First, if a case is indeed  in settlement talks, there is no better way to move those talks along than to unseal the case and get litigation rolling.  In fact, after unsealing, the government will have 120 days to serve the case, and that should be more than enough time to conclude settlement talks, especially if they are already underway.

As to the second example — waiting for documents from a defendant — government lawyers sometimes forget that it is they who control the momentum on civil investigative demands and subpoenas.  Yes, you want to allow people enough to time to respond, but at the same time I have seen more defendants abuse the document production excuse than not.

Finally, to end on a not-unrelated note, take a look at this recent Judicial Conference report on qui tam cases which makes some rather unorthodox recommendations to help Judges manage their statistics, such as removing qui tam/FCA cases from Judicial Conference statistics until the cases come unsealed….

Not sure how I feel about that…but certainly I think Judge Anderson’s approach is much, much better.

K&G Law Group is a boutique-style law firm based in Nothern Virginia and practicing nationwide

 

 

 

Share this on: Mixx Delicious Digg Facebook Twitter
mechanics of practice under the federal false claims actmechanics of practice under the virginia fraud against taxpayers act
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • It’s Official — K&G Law Group has the largest settlement in Virginia for 2018
  • Federal False Claims Act case against Virginia Birth Injury Fund settles for $20.7M
  • VaQuiTamLaw.com author Zachary Kitts quoted in Virginia Lawyers Weekly on pleading standards under the federal False Claims Act
  • DOJ Announces False Claims Act Settlement with British Airways and Iberia Airlines
  • Fraudulent heating costs charged to state and local governments in New York
  • HHS-OIG seeks public comments on health care kickbacks
  • BREAKING NEWS FROM THE RACE FOR VIRGINIA ATTORNEY GENERAL: JOHN FREY WITHDRAWS FROM THE RACE
  • Checking in on the 2013 race for Virginia Attorney General…
  • My two-cents on law as a career — for what it’s worth
  • One way to handle the other side’s resistance to paying attorney’s fees – “We’re made from rubber, and you’re made from glue….”
  • West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey reviews his first 100 days in office…and puts a West Virginia False Claims Act at the top of his wish list
  • Interesting Opinion on Lawyer Contingency Fees … And Proof that no good deed goes unpunished.
← Previous Next →

Search

Monthly Archives

  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018

Authors

  • Zachary Kitts

Copyright © 2019 Virginia Qui Tam Law.com.

Virginia Qui Tam Law.com is the first blog dedicated to the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act and to false claims act litigation in Virginia.