Important New Opinion from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Addresses the Seal Requirements of the Federal False Claims Act
An important new opinion issued today by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Alexandria Division) discusses the mandatory disclosure and seal requirements of the Federal False Claims Act. The opinion can be found on Westlaw as United States ex rel. Ubl v. IIF Data Solutions, et al., 2009 WL 1254704 (E.D.Va.) or by clicking here.
Those provisions, which are found in 31 U.S.C.S. sec. 3730(b)(2), famously require a qui tam plaintiff (or "relator" as plaintiff's are known in the parlance of qui tam) to serve a written disclosure memorandum and all material evidence on the government as a first step in the case. Then, and only then, should the relator file his complaint under seal with the Court. The matching Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act provision, which is identical to the federal statute, is found at Virginia Code sec. 8.01-216.5.
Most qui tam lawyers are of the opinion that the above requirements are procedural and not jurisdictional . This is the view adopted by Judge O'Grady in his opinion.
Previously, I posted on the topic of whether the provisions of Va. Code 8.01-216.5 apply to the Virginia Attorney General's Office. In other words, would the OAG need to file a self-initiated VFATA complaint under seal. Judge O'Grady's opinion provides further support for my position.
The specific issue in the May 5 opinion is an amended complaint filed by the relator, and defendants' motion to dismiss on the grounds that relator did not comply with the seal requirements of the statute.
Posted by Zachary Kitts at 5/5/2009 8:06 AM 
Categories: Litigation, Qui Tam practice in Virginia, Virginia Qui Tam filings, Virginia Whistleblowers, False Claims Act Practice in Virginia
Tags: Qui Tam Litigation in Virginia State false claims act news Virginia Legal Blogs
Categories: Litigation, Qui Tam practice in Virginia, Virginia Qui Tam filings, Virginia Whistleblowers, False Claims Act Practice in Virginia
Tags: Qui Tam Litigation in Virginia State false claims act news Virginia Legal Blogs
Comments